Owner of truck with vulgar anti-Trump sticker arrested on outstanding warrant

The proprietor of pickup truck that drew consideration this week as a result of of a profane anti-Trump was in Houston on Thursday on an outstanding warrant.

Karen Fonseca was arrested about 2 p.m. on an outstanding fraud warrant issued in August by the Rosenberg, Texas, Police Department, Fort Bend County Sheriff’s Office data present.

Mike Fonseca, her husband, posted her $1,500 bond Thursday night time and she or he was launched an hour later, Houston’s KHOU-TV reported.

A sheriff’s spokesman did not reply to a message in search of particulars concerning the warrant.

Previously, Fort Bend County Sheriff Troy Nehls threatened Fonseca with a disorderly conduct cost over the decal. However, District Attorney John Healey stated he didn’t assume the case would have stood up in courtroom as a result of of First Amendment protections on free speech.

Fonseca defended her proper to maintain the sticker on the car.

“It’s not to cause hate or animosity,” Fonseca, 46, advised the Houston Chronicle. “It’s just our freedom of speech and we’re exercising it.”

Fonseca stated the message has been on the rear window of the pickup for almost a yr and it will keep there in the intervening time.

“There’s no law against freedom of speech, nothing in the law book here in Texas,” she told KHOU-TV. “I’ve been stopped numerous times, but they can’t write me a ticket.”

Nehls on Wednesday posted a photograph of the profane sticker on his Facebook web page, threatening the then-unidentified Fonseca with a misdemeanor cost of disorderly conduct.

A spokeswoman for the sheriff’s workplace stated Thursday that Nehls eliminated the publish after Fonseca was recognized.

“Due to the hate messages he has been receiving toward his wife and children, the sheriff will not be commenting on the matter further,” the spokeswoman stated in an e-mail.

Lynne Rambo, a regulation professor at Texas A&M University specializing in First Amendment points, stated Thursday that a 1971 Supreme Court case made two factors clear: the state’s try to manage profanity or civil discourse is just not a enough purpose to justify proscribing speech, and profane language directed at a selected individual is totally different from content material that is broadly disseminated.

“It’s state action to threaten as (Nehls) did and he really ought to know First Amendment law better than that,” Rambo stated.

Nehls stated he helps freedom of speech however nervous that profane messages might incite others and result in confrontations that may disturb the peace he is pledged to maintain.

The Fort Bend County district lawyer has no plans to file costs over the sticker, KHOU reported.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source link